Little tradition and Great tradition is a conceptual approach that helps in the study of social change in India. It was first used by Robert Redfield in his book “Peasant Society and Culture” (1956) based on his study on villages of Mexico. Later on, Mckim Marriott and Milton Singer adopted this approach to study social changes in India.
Little tradition belongs to the peasants or folk society while Great traditions are of elite or thinking class.
Traditions can be defined as the transmitted value and behaviour of any community that has been persisting over time. It is not static but gets evolved with time.
There is constant interaction between the two traditions that means they are not completely independent of each other. They have some kind of interaction.
The social structures of traditions are different. The social structure of little tradition consists of folk artists, storytellers, poets, dancers etc. While the social structure of great tradition has ritual leaders, corporate groups, teachers, reciters and so on.
Civilization or structure of tradition grows in two stages- Orthogenetic and Heterogenetic. In the Indian context, we came from orthogenetic to heterogenetic. Orthogenetic is the indigenous evolution. It is the primary level of cultural organization.
Milton Singer views on the cultural changes in India
He said that in India the change is from little to a great tradition. It happens in continuation with the little tradition. This means that the tradition which is rooted in our culture is still there even after the evolution of culture. We never lose our indigenous culture in the process of adopting great traditions. Both are going hand in hand.
Some parts of our culture are imbibed in our bodies in such a way that we are still doing it unconsciously. Such parts of culture will always have a place in our hearts. We got to know about this culture through sacred literature, Brahmins, and other sources. This helps us in understanding and exploring our culture.
This change from tradition to modern culture is due to cultural continuity. We can say that our traditions have become modern but because of cultural continuity we are not totally given up the indigenous traditions.
He also said that both the traditions are interacting and independent in the case of India. We accepted the modern traditions but we did not give up our traditional values.
Views of Mckim Marriott on Little and Great Traditions
Based on his study done on Kishangarh village, UP he said that both traditions present together. Interaction is going on between both traditions.
There is an upward evolution from little tradition to the great tradition and it is known as Universalization. Or we can say that when great tradition borrows the elements of little tradition then it is known as Universalization. For example- Lakshmi’s worship during the Diwali festival is the Universalization of Goddess Saurati and Raksha Bandhan is universalized from Saluna festival.
But at the same time opposite is also happening i.e. downward devolution from great to little tradition and this is known as Parochialization. For example, now people are following Yoga, Ayurveda etc.
This approach helps us in the comparative study of culture. There is an interaction between the two which led to fusion and interpenetration. This interaction is circular and continuous. There is a mutual existence of different types of traditions.
Book- Indian Anthropology by Nadeem Hasnain
- Wendigo- The Cannibalistic Monster
- Number 13: Lucky or Unlucky
- An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology
- Language, Brain and Culture Interaction